Preparing for problem-based learning: evaluating expectations and readiness for programme change

Kerry, R., Mohamed, W., Vernon, E., Moffatt, F., Hendrick, P. and Carlin, A. (2024) Preparing for problem-based learning: evaluating expectations and readiness for programme change. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 12 (3). pp. 9-29. ISSN 2051-9788

Text Carlin_preparing for problem-based_2024.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (774kB)

Abstract

Background: Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centred pedagogy that utilises complex instructional scenarios to aid students in transitioning from theory to practice. PBL may offer a pertinent and effective strategy for developing fundamental competencies, skills, and attitudes in physiotherapists. PBL as a pedagogical practice is controversial, though, with arguments for and against the approach. As such, the University of Nottingham has reaccredited the BSc Physiotherapy program, which uses PBL as a pedagogy. This study analyses staff and student readiness before implementation. Aim: This study, conducted by the School of Health Science (SoHS), seeks to evaluate the preparedness and anticipations of students, staff, and clinicians regarding programme change. The findings will provide a set of initial measures for implementing the programme. Methods: The evaluation follows a mixed-methods, sequential design. The collection of quantitative data was achieved by a newly developed and validated questionnaire with first-into-second-year students. The qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and interviews. The collection of qualitative data investigates the perspectives and expectations of several stakeholders, including first-into-second-year students, staff, clinician and a patient, regarding the implementation of PBL and the new curriculum. Results: The internal consistency of our questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, which yielded a value of 0.83 for a total of 19 items. Additionally, the KR-20 coefficient was calculated to be 0.86 for a subset of two items. The content validity was assessed by calculating the item level content validity index (I-CVI) scores provided by three experts and ten students, and the ICVI was 0.88. Thirty first-into-second-year students completed the questionnaire. Nine first-into-second-year students participated in focus group interviews. Seven staff, a clinician, and a patient participated in individual interviews. Results from the questionnaire are presented in a narrative report. Five domains summarise the stakeholder perspectives about programme change, including: Quality of communication, Consistency of teaching, Approach to learning, Attitude to change, and Support structures. Conclusion: Analysis of the data collected indicates the need for proficient preparation. This evaluation demonstrates the importance of evaluating stakeholder perspectives prior to the implementation of an educational approach.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Published by JPAAP in 2024. This is the final published version of an open access article distributed under the terms of a creative commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Divisions:	School of Social Science
Depositing User:	Alexandra Carlin
Date Deposited:	07 Jan 2026 14:32
Last Modified:	07 Jan 2026 14:32
URI:	https://lbro.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/1287

Actions (login required)

Edit Item